Hi

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:50 AM Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
wrote:

> Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 6:49 PM Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> marcandre.lur...@redhat.com writes:
> >>
> >> > From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>
> >> >
> >> > The generated marshal functions do not visit arguments from commands
> >> > that take no arguments. Thus they fail to catch invalid
> >> > members. Visit the arguments, if provided, to throw an error in case
> of
> >> > invalid members.
> >> >
> >> > Currently, qmp_check_client_args() checks for invalid arguments and
> >> > correctly catches this case. When switching to qmp_dispatch() we want
> to
> >> > keep that behaviour. The commands using 'O' may have arbitrary
> >> > arguments, and must have 'gen': false in the qapi schema to skip the
> >> > generated checks.
> >>
> >> Explains why this isn't a bug fix for QMP.  What about QGA?
> >>
> >
> > Sorry, I don't understand what you ask. I thought the above paragraph
> that
> > I added described the current QMP behaviour and why we want to keep it.
> And
> > yes, it'a fix for qga too (it's qapi)
>
> If it *is* a fix for QGA (have you tested it?), the commit message needs
> to mention the fact more prominently.  I'll make a suggestion on v5 of
> this patch.
>

I added a test for QGA (to be added in v6):
https://github.com/elmarco/qemu/commit/a6912f43dcd06f558c0c88a5321fcbd8a507b5bc


>
> [...]
>
-- 
Marc-André Lureau

Reply via email to