Am 05.08.2016 um 08:48 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben: > Keith Busch <keith.bu...@intel.com> writes: > > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 09:42:13PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >> Third resent of this series after this didn't get picked up the > >> previous times. The Qemu NVMe implementation mistakes the cns > >> field in the Identify command as a boolean. This was never > >> true, and is actively harmful since NVMe1.1 (which the Qemu > >> device claims to support) supports more than two Identify variants. > >> > >> We had to add a quirk in Linux to work around this behavior. > > > > Yes, these are great. Do we need to ping a maintainer to go through > > their tree, or can this be applied immediately? If need be, I can apply > > and send a pull request. > > $ scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f hw/block/nvme.c > Keith Busch <keith.bu...@intel.com> (supporter:nvme) > Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com> (supporter:Block layer core) > Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com> (supporter:Block layer core) > qemu-bl...@nongnu.org (open list:nvme) > qemu-devel@nongnu.org (open list:All patches CC here) > > Send a pull request (assuming you have a properly signed PGP key).
Keith, I'll take the patches through my tree with your Acked-by, assuming that this makes the process easier for you. Sorry for forgetting about the previous version, I had intended to give others a chance to comment before I apply them, but then it fell through the cracks. Next time someone just send a quick "ping" reply after a week or so, please. Kevin
