On Wed, 08/03 13:00, John Snow wrote: > > > On 08/03/2016 12:44 PM, Max Reitz wrote: > > On 02.08.2016 02:12, John Snow wrote: > > > Key: > > > [----] : patches are identical > > > [####] : number of functional differences between upstream/downstream > > > patch > > > [down] : patch is downstream-only > > > The flags [FC] indicate (F)unctional and (C)ontextual differences, > > > respectively > > > > > > 001/10:[----] [-C] 'block: Hide HBitmap in block dirty bitmap interface' > > > 002/10:[----] [--] 'HBitmap: Introduce "meta" bitmap to track bit changes' > > > 003/10:[----] [--] 'tests: Add test code for meta bitmap' > > > 004/10:[0004] [FC] 'block: Support meta dirty bitmap' > > > 005/10:[----] [--] 'block: Add two dirty bitmap getters' > > > 006/10:[----] [--] 'block: Assert that bdrv_release_dirty_bitmap > > > succeeded' > > > 007/10:[----] [--] 'hbitmap: serialization' > > > 008/10:[----] [-C] 'block: BdrvDirtyBitmap serialization interface' > > > 009/10:[----] [--] 'tests: Add test code for hbitmap serialization' > > > 010/10:[----] [--] 'block: More operations for meta dirty bitmap' > > > > > > === > > > v8: Hello, is it v8 you're looking for? > > > === > > > > Thanks, queued for 2.8: > > > > https://github.com/XanClic/qemu/commits/block-next > > > > (Any volunteers for a MAINTAINERS entry regarding the bitmap code? :-)) > > > > Max > > > > Fam and I as co-maintainers, perhaps?
Sounds good to me, feel free to send a patch, John. Fam
