Hi Peter,
On 29/07/2016 15:35, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 6 July 2016 at 10:46, Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> +/**
>> + *
>> + * We currently do not use kvm_arm_register_device to provide
>> + * the kernel with the vITS control frame base address since the
>> + * KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CTRL_INIT init MUST be called after the
>> + * KVM_ARM_SET_DEVICE_ADDR and the kvm_arm_register_device
>> + * infra does not allow this.
>> + */
>
> So the conclusion on the kvm-arm mailing list was that the
> kernel ought to permit DEVICE_ADDR to be set after INIT,
> the same way it does for the GIC proper, right?
Yes this was indeed evoked but eventually what is in next, right now is
the same implementation where KVM_ARM_SET_DEVICE_ADDR is forbidden once
init is done:
see virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
its->initialized set by vgic_its_init_its (KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CTRL)
case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_ADDR:
../..
if (its->initialized)
return -EBUSY;
Thanks
Eric
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
>
