Hi Peter,

Thanks for your guidance!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Maydell [mailto:peter.mayd...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 5:23 PM
> To: 이광우(LEE KWANGWOO) MS SW
> Cc: Xiao Guangrong; Michael S. Tsirkin; Igor Mammedov; Paolo Bonzini; Richard 
> Henderson; Eduardo
> Habkost; Shannon Zhao; Shannon Zhao; QEMU Developers; qemu-arm; 정우석(CHUNG WOO 
> SUK) MS SW; 김현철(KIM
> HYUNCHUL) MS SW
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] hw/arm/virt: add nvdimm emulation support
> 
> On 26 July 2016 at 08:03, kwangwoo....@sk.com <kwangwoo....@sk.com> wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > Please, check the comments below. Thanks a lot!
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Peter Maydell [mailto:peter.mayd...@linaro.org]
> >> This seems to be missing code to write the device tree
> >> information about whatever this device is?
> >
> > Is it OK to just add a memory region which cannot be used without ACPI?
> > This is unclear to me. If you suggest that it is better way, I'll revise
> > this patch to add a device tree node. Please, help me to understand.
> 
> They don't necessarily both have to be added in the exact same patch
> if it's less confusing to split it, but the series as a whole
> should support both DT and ACPI (and your kernel patches also
> ought to have both DT and ACPI bindings I think).

Although NVDIMM is dependent on ACPI NFIT table currently, I'll keep
this comment in mind and revise it step by step.

> thanks
> -- PMM

Best Regards,
Kwangwoo Lee

Reply via email to