On 07/27/2010 02:19 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Anthony Liguori<anth...@codemonkey.ws> writes:
- any additional input on probed_raw?
Isn't it a fait accompli? I stopped providing input when commit
79368c81 appeared.
No. 79368c81 was to close the security hole (and I do consider it a
security hole). But as I mentioned on the list, I'm also not satisfied
with it and that's why I proposed probed_raw. I was hoping to get a
little more input from those that objected to 79368c81 as to whether
probed_raw was more agreeable.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
