On Mon, 2016-07-25 at 19:05 +0530, Richard Henderson wrote: > > An additional note is that if FE0/FE1 are 0, we still in some case > > leave an exception behind in cs->exception_index. Now, I *think* > > that's ok, it will just be silently dropped at some point, but I am not > > 100% certain as that's a part of TCG I'm an not super familiar with > > yet. > > That should be fine. All exits from the loop should set a new value here as > they exit.
Right though it *might* interact with the trace exception code (single step), I'll have at to dig a bit. I suspect I need to produce test cases :-) Cheers, Ben.
