On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 12:56:26AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 05:54:31PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > Series fixes migration issues caused by unstable cpu_index which depended > > on order cpus were created/destroyed. It follows David's idea to make > > cpu_index assignable by selected boards if board supports cpu-hotplug > > with device_add and needs stable cpu_index/'migration id' but leaves > > behaviour of the same as before for users that don't care about > > cpu-hot(un)plug making changes low-risk. > > > > tested with: > > SRC -snapshot -enable-kvm -smp 1,maxcpus=3 -m 256M guest.img -monitor > > stdio \ > > -device qemu64-x86_64-cpu,id=cpudel,apic-id=1 \ > > -device qemu64-x86_64-cpu,apic-id=2 > > (qemu) device_del cpudel > > (qemu) stop > > (qemu) migrate "exec:gzip -c > STATEFILE.gz" > > > > DST -snapshot -enable-kvm -smp 1,maxcpus=3 -m 256M guest.img -monitor > > stdio \ > > -device qemu64-x86_64-cpu,apic-id=2 \ > > -incoming "exec: gzip -c -d STATEFILE.gz" > > > > git tree to test with: > > https://github.com/imammedo/qemu cpu-index-stable > > to view > > https://github.com/imammedo/qemu/commits/cpu-index-stable > > For PC bits: > > Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> > > This would be nice to have in 2.7.
I agree. Despite the lateness, I think this will avoid substantial
future pain.
> Who's reviewing/merging the rest? Eduardo?
I've reviewed. I could merge through my tree if we don't have a
better option, but merging pc specific pieces through the ppc tree
would seem odd.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
