Now that the block layer honors max_request, we don't need to bother with an EINVAL on overlarge requests, but can instead assert that requests are well-behaved.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> --- block/iscsi.c | 14 ++++---------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/iscsi.c b/block/iscsi.c index cf1e9e7..bdc7ade 100644 --- a/block/iscsi.c +++ b/block/iscsi.c @@ -472,11 +472,8 @@ iscsi_co_writev_flags(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num, int nb_sectors, return -EINVAL; } - if (bs->bl.max_transfer && - nb_sectors << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS > bs->bl.max_transfer) { - error_report("iSCSI Error: Write of %d sectors exceeds max_xfer_len " - "of %" PRIu32 " bytes", nb_sectors, bs->bl.max_transfer); - return -EINVAL; + if (bs->bl.max_transfer) { + assert(nb_sectors << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS <= bs->bl.max_transfer); } lba = sector_qemu2lun(sector_num, iscsilun); @@ -650,11 +647,8 @@ static int coroutine_fn iscsi_co_readv(BlockDriverState *bs, return -EINVAL; } - if (bs->bl.max_transfer && - nb_sectors << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS > bs->bl.max_transfer) { - error_report("iSCSI Error: Read of %d sectors exceeds max_xfer_len " - "of %" PRIu32 " bytes", nb_sectors, bs->bl.max_transfer); - return -EINVAL; + if (bs->bl.max_transfer) { + assert(nb_sectors << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS <= bs->bl.max_transfer); } if (iscsilun->lbprz && nb_sectors >= ISCSI_CHECKALLOC_THRES && -- 2.5.5