On 1 July 2016 at 14:02, Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com> wrote: > In some ways this v2 is more of an RFC then the initial posting, which > had a different subject, and is here [*]. In this version we point out > the real [current] goal, which is to get the guest MPIDR consistent > with KVM. However, what's debatable is we purposefully neglect 32-bit > consistency, as KVM likely needs to be changed, but will likely not > be changed until it gains gicv3 support. Also, potentially debatable, > is how keeping the 2.6 machine type compatible is approached. I think > it's right, and likely the pattern we should use going forward for > similar changes, but, hey, a patch is always a good conversation > starter... Way better than most centerpieces anyway :-)
Looks like a good approach to me, and nobody else has complained... Applied to target-arm.next, thanks. -- PMM
