On 6 July 2016 at 10:36, Michael Rolnik <mrol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Peter, > > I think I will do the following > 1. helper fullwr will modify CPU owned registers by itself and call cpu_outb > for non owned registers
This doesn't sound right -- if helper_fullwr is for memory writes it shouldn't call cpu_outb, which is IO space. The distinction here is between different kinds of what QEMU calls "address spaces".Pretty much every CPU has an address space for "memory", which is what you can access via the usual load and store instructions. Some CPUs also have an address space for "IO", if they have dedicated different IO instructions. The usual example of this is x86 -- an X86 "outb" instruction to port 0 is different from store-byte to memory address 0. So we have an address space for the "io space" which inb/outb/etc access, and one for memory which loads and stores access. Most CPUs don't have this kind of split idea of device IO as different from memory access (their devices are "memory mapped"); our models of these CPUs don't have an address space for IO, because there isn't one in the real hardware. It looked to me from glancing through the data sheet that these IO registers in your CPU are accessed via normal memory loads and stores, which would mean that the devices for them should go in the usual address space for memory, not a different one for IO, and you shouldn't call cpu_outb at all. thanks -- PMM
