On 1 July 2016 at 12:40, Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com> wrote: > I might have mentioned in the commit message that the ACPI generation > already does this, as _CCA is set to 1, added with commit bc64b96c > (assuming I'm right, and a value of 1 there is the ACPI equivalent of > this patch) > > bc64b96c's commit message is also lacking, in the fact it doesn't > state why the value of 1 is chosen, only that the attribute is > compulsory, which I presume could have been added with the value 0 > to satisfy that. > > Anyway, I just wanted to point out that I *think* we're fine for > ACPI. Perhaps I'm the only one who didn't know that already though...
Thanks for the update: I've edited the commit message to add: # This brings the DT description into line with the ACPI description, # which already marks the PCI bridge as cache coherent (see commit # bc64b96c984abf). thanks -- PMM
