On 22 June 2016 at 20:55, Peter Lieven <p...@kamp.de> wrote: > What makes the coroutine pool memory intensive is the stack size of 1MB per > coroutine. Is it really necessary to have such a big stack?
That reminds me that I was wondering if we should allocate our coroutine stacks with MAP_GROWSDOWN (though if we're not actually using 1MB of stack then it's only going to be eating virtual memory, not necessarily real memory.) thanks -- PMM
