> On 20 May 2016 at 13:48, Riku Voipio <riku.voi...@iki.fi> wrote: >> On torstaina 12. toukokuuta 2016 17.34.42 EEST, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> We should either fix our unicore32 support to use the real >>> syscall numbers, or just drop it; since nobody has touched >>> linux-user/unicore32 since 2012, and there have been no >>> commits to target-unicore32 that aren't generic "clean up >>> all targets" type patches since 2012 or 2013, and nobody >>> has ever complained that the syscall numbers are all broken, >>> my initial inclination is to say we should just drop this. >>> >>> Opinions? > >> I agree. I don't have a test setup for unicore, so unicore >> has seen nothing but compile testing... > > I've put a note in the 2.7 Changelog saying we're going to > remove unicore32-linux-user in 2.8. > > thanks > -- PMM >
Hi, peter. I'm the maintainer of target-unicore32. Though there's no commit since 2012, we're using qemu (but old version) to test our new kernel and software-images. I'll upgrade to new qemu and fix syscall problem. Thanks. Xuetao
