Seems arm_cpu_do_unaligned_access() function could use it. It uses cpu_mmu_index() for now but I think use of mmu_idx is preferred. Anyway it's the subject for another patch.
13.06.2016, 10:47, "Aurelien Jarno" <aurel...@aurel32.net>: > On 2016-06-10 19:26, Sergey Sorokin wrote: >> There are functions cpu_unaligned_access() and do_unaligned_access() that >> are called with access type and mmu index arguments. But these arguments >> are named 'is_write' and 'is_user' in their declarations. >> The patch fixes the names to avoid a confusion. > > Unless I missed something, it seems that the is_user/mmu_idx argument is > never used. Should we maybe just drop it? > > Otherwise it looks fine. > > -- > Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B > aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
