On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 25 May 2016 at 19:49, Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@xilinx.com> wrote: >> If the caller didn't specify an architecture for the ELF machine >> the load_elf() function will auto detect it based on the ELF file. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@xilinx.com> >> --- >> V7: >> - Fix typo >> >> hw/core/loader.c | 10 ++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/hw/core/loader.c b/hw/core/loader.c >> index 53e0e41..a8a372d 100644 >> --- a/hw/core/loader.c >> +++ b/hw/core/loader.c >> @@ -419,6 +419,7 @@ int load_elf(const char *filename, uint64_t >> (*translate_fn)(void *, uint64_t), >> { >> int fd, data_order, target_data_order, must_swab, ret = ELF_LOAD_FAILED; >> uint8_t e_ident[EI_NIDENT]; >> + uint16_t e_machine; >> >> fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY | O_BINARY); >> if (fd < 0) { >> @@ -451,6 +452,15 @@ int load_elf(const char *filename, uint64_t >> (*translate_fn)(void *, uint64_t), >> goto fail; >> } >> >> + if (elf_machine < 1) { >> + /* The caller didn't specify an ARCH, we can figure it out */ >> + lseek(fd, 0x12, SEEK_SET); >> + if (read(fd, &e_machine, sizeof(e_machine)) != sizeof(e_machine)) { >> + goto fail; >> + } >> + elf_machine = e_machine; >> + } > > Isn't there an endianness problem here, given that e_machine is a 16 > bit field? In load_elf32()/load_elf64() we will byteswap the e_machine > field we read off the disk if must_swab is true, which will mean it won't > match the value we've read here and not byteswapped. > > I think you're better off pushing the "allow architecture to be > unspecified" support down into load_elf32()/load_elf64(), where > it can just become > > if (elf_machine < 1) { > elf_machine = ehdr.e_machine; > } > > once the load_elf code has read and byteswapped the header for you.
Good point, I didn't realise it was the same code for both. I have moved it into load_elf64/load_elf32. Thanks, Alistair > > thanks > -- PMM >