2010/5/30 Blue Swirl <blauwir...@gmail.com>:
> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
> <atar4q...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> For me is also interesting what do we miss in the microSPARC implementation.
>> If I switch off POST (which crashes due to the known FPU problems)
>> LX/CX/X OBPs hang. Looks like it's expecting some interrupt (the SS-5
>> OBP escapes a similar endless loop on a timer irq), but not getting
>> it.
>> Do you know anything obvious qemu is missing in LX machine?
>
> I don't have a device tree for LX, but unimplemented interrupt sources
> could be audio, parallel port, video, modem. Floppy may be buggy.
Nice try. :) But it was really waiting for the timer irq. The
following patch solves the problem, but I'm not sure if it's the
proper place for the fix.
--- a/hw/slavio_timer.c
+++ b/hw/slavio_timer.c
@@ -232,6 +231,12 @@ static void slavio_timer_mem_writel(void *opaque,
target_phys_addr_t addr,
} else {
ptimer_set_limit(t->timer, LIMIT_TO_PERIODS(t->limit), 1);
}
+ if (t->running) {
+ ptimer_stop(t->timer);
+ ptimer_run(t->timer, 0);
+
+ }
+
}
}
break;
The interrupt is not generated if the timer has been running at the
time ptimer_set_limit() is called. Not sure what is the
ptimer_set_limit()'s contract. Should it handle changing the limit on
a working timer?
The patch makes LX OBP v2.10 sort of functional (it fails on DBRI and
cg6 init, but gets up to the "ok" prompt), and SS-10 OBP v2.10 fully
functional (with some cpu models).
The later is interesting: it autodetects SX/cg14, so can work with the
Bob's cg14 patch, as well as without it.
--
Regards,
Artyom Tarasenko
solaris/sparc under qemu blog: http://tyom.blogspot.com/
