On 2 June 2016 at 21:07, Michael Rolnik <mrol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Michael Rolnik <mrol...@gmail.com> > --- > target-avr/cpu-qom.h | 38 +++++------------ > target-avr/cpu.c | 100 > +++++++++++++------------------------------- > target-avr/cpu.h | 74 ++++++++------------------------ > target-avr/gdbstub.c | 10 +---- > target-avr/helper.c | 52 ++++++----------------- > target-avr/translate-inst.c | 54 +++++++++++++++--------- > target-avr/translate-inst.h | 20 +++++++++ > target-avr/translate.c | 27 +++--------- > target-avr/translate.h | 5 +-- > 9 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 246 deletions(-)
Rather than fixing up code style issues in the preceding patches, I think you would be better to just fold these changes into those patches so that the code is right the first time. PS: it would be good if you could provide a cover letter when you send out the next round of these patches; that provides a handy way to deal with the series as a whole (for both automated tools and people), so we tend to prefer multi-patch sets to have one. thanks -- PMM
