On 2 June 2016 at 10:18, KONRAD Frederic <fred.kon...@greensocs.com> wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Do you agree with this? I think you are the hw/*/omap* maintainer?
The in-master OMAP stuff is pretty ancient and not a good pattern for anything. You could have a look at the omap3 clocktree stuff that's in the qemu-linaro tree; that is also now quite old but it is a bit more featured. (It probably isn't actually something worth copying as such but it might suggest required features.) I agree that clock tree modelling ought to be more generic than what we have today. thanks -- PMM
