On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 10:11:05AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 01/06/2016 04:29, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> > On 27/05/16 17:54, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >> On 04/05/16 16:52, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >>> This allows dynamic allocation for migrating arrays.
> >>>
> >>> Already existing VMSTATE_VARRAY_UINT32 requires an array to be
> >>> pre-allocated, however there are cases when the size is not known in
> >>> advance and there is no real need to enforce it.
> >>>
> >>> This defines another variant of VMSTATE_VARRAY_UINT32 with WMS_ALLOC
> >>> flag which tells the receiving side to allocate memory for the array
> >>> before receiving the data.
> >>>
> >>> The first user of it is a dynamic DMA window which existence and size
> >>> are totally dynamic.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <a...@ozlabs.ru>
> >>> Reviewed-by: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
> >>
> >>
> >> In what tree is this going to go? pseries? Or migration?
> > 
> > Anyone?
> 
> Go ahead, include it.

I'm guessing that's an invitation to merge it via my tree, since
Alexey doesn't send direct pull requests.  I've now done so.

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to