On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 09:52:23AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> Similar to the "!drv || !drv->bdrv_aio_ioctl" case above, here it is
> okay to set co.ret and return. As pointed out by Paolo, a BH will be
> created as necessary by the caller (bdrv_co_maybe_schedule_bh).
> Besides, as pointed out by Kevin, "data" was leaked before.
> 
> Reported-by: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  block/io.c | 20 ++------------------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Thanks, applied to my block tree:
https://github.com/stefanha/qemu/commits/block

Stefan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to