11.05.2016 00:16, James Clarke wrote: > On Sparc, gcc implicitly passes --relax to the linker, but -r is > incompatible with this. Therefore, if --no-relax is supported, it should > be passed to the linker.
Applied to -trivial, thanks! /mjt
11.05.2016 00:16, James Clarke wrote: > On Sparc, gcc implicitly passes --relax to the linker, but -r is > incompatible with this. Therefore, if --no-relax is supported, it should > be passed to the linker.
Applied to -trivial, thanks! /mjt