On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:57:26 +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Emilio, is there anything you want to add? I've been following the QHT
> stuff which is a really positive addition which my v3 base patches is
> based upon (making the hot-path non lock contended). Do you have
> anything in the works above that?
- I'll submit a new v6 of the qht patches once v5 gets more reviews.
The changes so far are very minor so I take that as a sign that the
patchset will be merged soon.
- I'm also preparing a patch to leverage the host's cmpxchg for atomic
instruction emulation, starting with i386 guests.
Emilio
