On Tue, 10 May 2016 17:19:35 -0300 Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 02:33:19PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com> > > As the property is useless if no code is reading > s->pm.cpu_hotplug_legacy. What about squashing patches 10/42 and > 12/42 together? I've thought splitting trivial boiler plate code for adding property would make it smaller/easier to review. But I'm ok with squashing it into 12/42 if it makes review easier.
