> 在 2016年5月5日，20:51，Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> 写道： > >> On 5 May 2016 at 11:38, 赵小强 <zxq_yx_...@163.com> wrote: >> At 2016-03-29 15:47:19, "xiaoqiang zhao" <zxq_yx_...@163.com> wrote: >>> This patch set trys to QOM'ify hw/char files, see commit messages >>> for more details >>> >>> Changes in v2: >>> * rename TYPE_SCLP_LM_CONSOLE to TYPE_SCLPLM_CONSOLE which is suggested by >>> Cornelia Huck <cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com> >>> * rebase on the current master >>> >>> xiaoqiang zhao (6): >>> hw/char: QOM'ify escc.c >>> hw/char: QOM'ify etraxfs_ser.c >>> hw/char: QOM'ify lm32_juart.c >>> hw/char: QOM'ify lm32_uart.c >>> hw/char: QOM'ify sclpconsole-lm.c >>> hw/char: QOM'ify sclpconsole.c >>> >>> hw/char/escc.c | 12 +++++------- >>> hw/char/etraxfs_ser.c | 11 +++++------ >>> hw/char/lm32_juart.c | 9 +++------ >>> hw/char/lm32_uart.c | 12 +++++------- >>> hw/char/sclpconsole-lm.c | 14 +++++++++----- >>> hw/char/sclpconsole.c | 12 ++++++++---- >>> 6 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) >>> >>> -- >>> 2.1.4 >> >> ping ??? > > I think you will have better luck if you rearrange all these > QOM patches so that you provide them as one series per board > or per target architecture, not one per type of device. > There is no single person with responsibility for "all of > hw/char" so structuring your cleanup patchsets like this will > tend to result in the people who might care about the devices > not looking at them. (Also you can concentrate on the devices > which are actively maintained, like ARM ones, x86 ones, MIPS > and SPARC ones, rather than the oddballs semi-orphaned ones > like lm32, CRIS, etc.) > > thanks > -- PMM
Thanks peter, Sounds reasonable!
