On (Tue) 19 Apr 2016 [09:28:34], Jason J. Herne wrote:
> On 04/19/2016 02:39 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
> >Hi Jason,
> >
> >We've had the new autoconverge features enabled for a full release
> >now, what are your thoughts on dropping the x- ?
> >
> >Some factors I consider are direct user feedback, changes to the
> >functionality / API, and higher-level user feedback (like libvirt). I
> >believe libvirt is now using the new options, and they've not
> >complained. So we could be ready to drop the x- prefix.
> >
> >Thoughts?
> >
>
> Hi Amit,
>
> Yes, I agree with you. We can probably drop the x-. The new autoconverge
> behavior was actually "in place" for the entire release. It was only the new
> commands to adjust throttling parameters that were marked as experimental.
> It is great that no one found any bugs. Let's hope it stays that way :)
OK - can you send a patch? It'll be a 2.7 patch, though.
Our QE team also recently started testing the new autoconverge, so if
there's anything in there, it would be known soon :-)
Thanks,
Amit
