On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 13:19:22 -0400, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
> We are inconsistent with the type of tb->flags: usage varies loosely
> between int and uint64_t. Settle to uint32_t everywhere, which is
> superior to both: at least one target (aarch64) uses the most significant
> bit in the u32, and uint64_t is wasteful.
>
> Compile-tested for all targets.
>
> Suggested-by: Laurent Desnogues <laurent.desnog...@gmail.com>
> Suggested-by: Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net>
> Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota <c...@braap.org>
Has this patch been queued by anyone? If not, should I resend after
2.6 is released?
Thanks,
Emilio
