Wouter, On 12 Apr 2016, at 14:01, Wouter Verhelst <w...@uter.be> wrote:
> It's not being applied because of this ;-) OK, I've sent a PATCHv9 with my suggested wording (so at least it doesn't make anything worse), but I really think we should avoid addressing further nits in the disconnection regime within a change which is meant to be documenting TLS. Alex > I can probably apply it and then work on the clarification of that > paragraph, I suppose, but I'd prefer doing it right from the get go. -- Alex Bligh
