> On 03 Apr 2016, at 20:01, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> ... This is you changing QEMU to not compile a file that was
> previously always compiled. If you do that then it's
> not surprising if things might break when you move to an
> upstream version, that's all.

well, to summarise, I notified you that in certain conditions, due to an 
non-obvious dependency that does not break the build when not met, the existing 
code crashes at run time with a segmentation fault, and I suggested that an 
assert might help developers to save some debugging time. 

if you want to add this assert, ok; if you don't, and prefer to permanently 
blame my fork for various reasons, it's also fine, I don't mind, I fix it in my 
fork and move forward.


regards,

Liviu



Reply via email to