On 3/29/16 06:57, Chen Gang wrote: > On 3/29/16 06:17, Laurent Vivier wrote: >> >> The address of retcode in host and guest can differ. >> You need something like: >> >> restorer = (unsigned long)(frame_addr + offsetof(struct >> target_rt_sigframe, retcode)); >> >> I've experienced this on sh4 (see commit 2a0fa68) >> > > OK, thanks. What you said above sounds reasonable to me. :-) > > I shall send patch v2 for it (although tilegx is a pure 64-bit target, > with this patch, I guess, tilegx target should still run correctly under > 32-bit host). > > By the way, it looks that s390x and microblaze targets also have the > same issue.
It looks the alpha target may also need consider about retcode, for "r26 = frame_addr" in setup_rt_frame(). Thanks. -- Chen Gang (陈刚) Managing Natural Environments is the Duty of Human Beings.
