On 17/03/2016 12:32, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > 1) files should actually be named etc/ovmf/foo. OVMF could optionally > > accept both the old and the new names for a while, you would decide > > whether this is useful. > > IOW if etc/ovmf exists, then ignore opt/ovmf? OK. > > > 2) in turn, because of (1) even the warning on opt/ should be removed. > > If we do 2) then users might put files in etc/ovmf/foo.
Right, that's exactly the point. These are user-configurable knobs for the firmware (user-configurable meaning they can't be expected to recompile QEMU). Paolo
