On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> device_del
>> ----------
>>
>> Remove a device.
>>
>> Arguments:
>>
>> - "id": the device's ID (json-string)
>
> "id" should become "device" (I hope to send the corresponding patches
> this night). The idea is to not only allow global device IDs but also
> qtree paths here.
>
Now I'm confused. On a previous email when discussing about
query-netdev, I initially proposed this[1]:
-> { "execute": "query-netdev" }
<- {
"return": [
{
"device": "tap.0",
"vlan": 0,
"info": {
"script": "/etc/qemu-ifup",
"downscript": "/etc/qemu-ifdown",
"ifname": "tap0",
"model": "tap"
},
},
And latter on Anthony suggested to replace "device" by "id" [2].
So my doubt is: we should identify guest/frontend devices in QMP using
the word "device" instead of "id" and identify backend devices by
using the word "id"?
Regards,
Miguel
[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2010-06/msg00619.html
[2] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2010-06/msg00943.html
