On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 19:42 +0700, Peter Maydell wrote: > > Yes; I'm describing QEMU's workflow, not trying to present it as > the One True Way of doing things. I would quibble with the > "not to bother" phrasing, though -- if I reviewed everything going > into master this would not scale and I would very quickly burn out > and go spend my time studying Japanese instead. The pullreqs-from- > submaintainers setup is specifically intended to spread that > review and test workload out to a wider circle of people (who > also have local-subject-area expertise which I don't have). > That I don't review the patches flowing into master via the > pulls I merge is a feature of this workflow, not a bug.
Yeah, but the important criterion is *who* the thing comes from (and again, a signed git tag is just as good as a set of signed emails). It *isn't* about pull vs. email. That's just the transport mechanism. There may be a correlation, but it isn't important. -- dwmw2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
