On 08/03/2016 13:13, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > As far as this QEMU port is concerned, having some flash in secure and > > some in non-secure is going to be useful regardless, and 64 MB is > > plenty for both the code and the data. So if users of the Trustzone > > port (which is disjoint from the KVM port in any case) can tolerate > > having the code and the variables in the same pflash file, I could > > simply move the code into the second flash, and we could reserve the > > first flash for secure (so it sits at physical address 0x0 > > Uhm, actually, the code is not even in the flash to begin with. So > having the second bank be non-secure only makes perfect sense imo
Interesting, where is the code? Paolo
