> From: Peter Maydell [mailto:peter.mayd...@linaro.org] > Sent: Monday, 7 March 2016 8:37 PM > > On 4 March 2016 at 01:24, Andrew Baumann > <andrew.baum...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > At present, all DMA transfers complete inline (so a looping descriptor > > queue will lock up the device). We also do not model pause/abort, > > arbitrarion/priority, or debug features. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Baumann <andrew.baum...@microsoft.com> > > --- > > Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> > > Can you add Gregory's Signed-off-by (and authorship from?) to whichever > patches are appropriate when you resend (as per discussion on the > earlier version of this patch)?
Yes, happily. But what's the best way to capture this when the code we're committing is a mixture of code from Gregory and Stefan (via a manual patch into Stefan's ar7 repo, so much of that history is lost to me) that I've then extended and refactored? I know what I added (e.g. aux), but for the files with joint authorship (fb, dma) should we just put Gregory as the author on those patches with a signed-off-by from me? Can I also add a signed-off-by on behalf of Gregory, or does he need to do it? Forgive the newbie questions, but I'm new to this process and want to get it right :) Note that we didn't do this for the previous patch series. Mea culpa. If there's a good way to go back and correct history, I'm happy to help. Thanks, Andrew
