On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 02:18:23PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote: > This will be shared by the next patch. > > Also add a comment explaining the unobvious condition on "size.hi". > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com> > --- > exec.c | 14 +++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c > index ad8b826..b4e2eb5 100644 > --- a/exec.c > +++ b/exec.c > @@ -307,6 +307,16 @@ static void phys_page_compact_all(AddressSpaceDispatch > *d, int nodes_nb) > } > } > > +static inline bool section_covers_addr(const MemoryRegionSection *section, > + hwaddr addr) > +{ > + /* Memory topology clips a memory region to 2^64, size.hi >= 0 means the > + * section must cover any addr. */ > + return section->size.hi || > + range_covers_byte(section->offset_within_address_space, > + section->size.lo, addr); > +} > + > static MemoryRegionSection *phys_page_find(PhysPageEntry lp, hwaddr addr, > Node *nodes, MemoryRegionSection > *sections) > { > @@ -322,9 +332,7 @@ static MemoryRegionSection *phys_page_find(PhysPageEntry > lp, hwaddr addr, > lp = p[(index >> (i * P_L2_BITS)) & (P_L2_SIZE - 1)]; > } > > - if (sections[lp.ptr].size.hi || > - range_covers_byte(sections[lp.ptr].offset_within_address_space, > - sections[lp.ptr].size.lo, addr)) { > + if (section_covers_addr(§ions[lp.ptr], addr)) { > return §ions[lp.ptr]; > } else { > return §ions[PHYS_SECTION_UNASSIGNED]; > -- > 2.4.3 >