On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Martin, > > despite the apparent simplicity, this patch is very hard to review. I > suggest splitting it in several parts so that the various submaintainers > can look at it. I can take a look at cpus.c, exec.c, kvm-all.c and > include/exec/, for example. > > Please use size_t instead of hwaddr to refer to the size of a buffer in > host memory, for example address_space_rw's buf argument.
Ok, will do. Thanks for the response!
