在 2016年02月23日 17:04, Peter Maydell 写道:
On 23 February 2016 at 05:11, hitmoon <zxq_yx_...@163.com> wrote:
在 2016年02月22日 19:03, Peter Maydell 写道:
You'd basically need to have extra VMState structures for the
devices themselves which just said "inside this M48txxISAState
is an M48t59State", and "inside this M48txxSysBusState is a
M48t59State" and referred to the existing vmstate for the
M48t59State.
I add a new structure for m48t59_isa as follows:
static const VMStateDescription vmstate_m48t59_isa = {
.name = "m48t59-isa",
.version_id = 1,
.minimum_version_id = 1,
.fields = (VMStateField[]) {
VMSTATE_UINT8(state.lock, M48txxISAState),
VMSTATE_UINT16(state.addr, M48txxISAState),
VMSTATE_VBUFFER_UINT32(state.buffer, M48txxISAState, 0, NULL, 0,
state.size),
VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
}
};
is this correct?
No. I said you needed to have a vmstate struct that said
"inside this M48txxISAState is a M48t59State", and your
suggested struct is not doing that.
thanks
-- PMM
I still can NOT understand your intention properly. Can you explain more
clearly?
