On 02/21/2016 10:01 PM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bhar...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  hw/cpu/package.c    | 19 +++++++++++++
>  hw/ppc/spapr.c      | 79 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/hw/boards.h |  1 +
>  qapi-schema.json    | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 147 insertions(+)
> 

> +++ b/qapi-schema.json
> @@ -4083,3 +4083,51 @@
>  ##
>  { 'enum': 'ReplayMode',
>    'data': [ 'none', 'record', 'play' ] }
> +
> +##
> +# @CPUThreadInfo:
> +#
> +# Information about CPU Threads
> +#

Missing documentation for the fields.

> +# Since: 2.6
> +##
> +
> +{ 'struct': 'CPUInfo',
> +  'data': { 'arch_id': 'int',

New QMP code should favor '-' over '_'; this should be 'arch-id'.

> +            'type': 'str',

Is this string free-form, or is it a finite set of values?  If the
latter, then it should be an enum type.

> +            '*thread': 'int',
> +            '*core': 'int',
> +            '*socket' : 'int',
> +            '*node' : 'int',
> +            '*qom_path': 'str'

'qom-path'. But this one is definitely free-form, so 'str' is right.

> +          }
> +}
> +
> +##
> +# @CPUPackageInfo:
> +#
> +# Information about CPU Packages
> +#

Missing field documentation.

> +# Since: 2.6
> +##
> +
> +{ 'struct': 'CPUPackageInfo',
> +  'data': { '*id': 'str',
> +            'type': 'str',
> +            'qom_path': 'str',
> +            'realized': 'bool',
> +            'nr_cpus': 'int',

'nr-cpus'. Is this field redundant, given that the caller can just count
the length of the 'cpus' array?

> +            'cpus' : ['CPUInfo']
> +          }
> +}
> +
> +##
> +# @query-cpu-packages:
> +#
> +# Returns information for all CPU packages
> +#
> +# Returns: a list of @CPUPackageInfo
> +#
> +# Since: 2.6
> +##
> +{ 'command': 'query-cpu-packages', 'returns': ['CPUPackageInfo'] }
> 

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to