On Tuesday, February 16, 2016, Shlomo Pongratz <shlomopongr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, February 16, 2016, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','peter.mayd...@linaro.org');>> wrote: > >> On 31 January 2016 at 15:54, Shlomo Pongratz <shlomopongr...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > I will do a new revision of the GICv3. >> > I needed to get a time slot from my employee in order to do the work >> and I >> > got one starting next week. >> >> Hi Shlomo; I was just wondering how you were getting on with this? >> >> I ask because now I'm getting to the end of the TrustZone stuff >> I've been working on I expect to have more time to help with >> review/code/whatever for the GICv3. So I don't want to tread on >> your toes with stuff you're working on now, but if you do find >> you don't have time to make forward progress could you let me know? >> (or if there's something you want help with do say.) >> >> thank >> -- PMM >> > > Hi, > > I just got a go ahead. > I'm reviewing all the comments and pulling latest revision. > I assume it will take a week or two. > Best regards, > > S.P. > > Hi, Working of re-basing the GICv3 I've noticed in the mailing list Pavel's patch series named "GICv3 live migration support". This patch series modifies GICv3 structures. I can see that this patch series was not merged in the latest git that I've pulled (commit 80b5d6bfc). So me question is, should I use the relevant patches in my patch series or ignore them? Best regards, S.P.
