On 06/10/2010 06:32 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
I understand why that's the most sensible cache setting. But if the
user explicitly asks for something else, I think we better give it to
him, or tell him no. Ignoring him silently isn't nice.
Ah, it's clearer now...
I guess one could use cache=something together with snapshot to do
benchmarking. Actually the same changes in behavior (unsafe as default,
but observe a non-default value) can be done to -drive ...,snapshot too.
Maybe I'll give it a shot.
Paolo
