On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 08:52:44AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > > > the same or just use it on the first one we encounter. We're probably > > putting way too much thought into this scenario that Intel likely has no > > expectation of supporting though ;) Thanks, > > Yea, lets stick with the plain simple "igd-opregion". Even if intel > allows multiple igd devices per host some day things continue to work as > long as you assign only one of them to a guest.
Sounds good. The patch looks fine to me. I do think we should commit to SeaBIOS only after the QEMU support is accepted though. -Kevin
