On 02/04/2016 04:03 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c >> index 595af1a..f712db5 100644 >> --- a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c >> +++ b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c >> @@ -543,6 +543,33 @@ static int virtscsi_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *sc) >> return virtscsi_tmf(vscsi, cmd); >> } >> >> +static enum blk_eh_timer_return virtscsi_timed_out(struct scsi_cmnd *sc) >> +{ >> + struct virtio_scsi *vscsi = shost_priv(sc->device->host); >> + struct virtio_scsi_cmd *cmd; >> + >> + scmd_printk(KERN_INFO, sc, "timeout\n"); >> + cmd = mempool_alloc(virtscsi_cmd_pool, GFP_NOIO); >> + if (!cmd) >> + return FAILED; > > Should this be BLK_EH_NOT_HANDLED? Apart from this, the patch looks > good. And of course this doesn't affect Jim, who can test this patch > anyway. > Why, but of course.
I'll be sending the official patch to linux-scsi. Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking h...@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)