On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> {
>> "device": "user.0",
>> "type": "user",
>> "info": {
>> "net": "10.0.2.0",
>> "netmask": "255.255.255.0"
>> },
>> },
>
> And this one's not connected to a VLAN. It may or may not be connected
> to a single guest device. If it is, then that device has a "netdev"
> property pointing to it.
>
> For what it's worth, "info network" shows that device as "peer=ID".
Yes, this information is important. Should I name it 'peer' or
'netdev'? I think 'peer' would be better, because the name 'netdev'
points to 'backend network device' IMHO.
Will it be better stored in the 'info' object or the device object? I
think it should go into the device object. There will be vlan or peer
or none of them in case the netdev is just there doing nothing (odd,
but still).
{
"device": "user.0",
"type": "user",
"peer": "e1000.0";
"info": {
"net": "10.0.2.0",
"netmask": "255.255.255.0"
},
},
Regards,
Miguel
