On 01/22/2016 04:36 PM, zhanghailiang wrote:
> We may want to accept zero interval when VM FT solutions like MC
> or COLO use this filter to release packets on demand.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghaili...@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Yang Hongyang <hongyang.y...@easystack.cn>
> ---
> net/filter-buffer.c | 10 ----------
> 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
Looks a independent patch of this rfc series.
>
> diff --git a/net/filter-buffer.c b/net/filter-buffer.c
> index 57be149..12e0c87 100644
> --- a/net/filter-buffer.c
> +++ b/net/filter-buffer.c
> @@ -103,16 +103,6 @@ static void filter_buffer_setup(NetFilterState *nf,
> Error **errp)
> {
> FilterBufferState *s = FILTER_BUFFER(nf);
>
> - /*
> - * We may want to accept zero interval when VM FT solutions like MC
> - * or COLO use this filter to release packets on demand.
> - */
> - if (!s->interval) {
> - error_setg(errp, QERR_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE, "interval",
> - "a non-zero interval");
> - return;
> - }
> -
> s->incoming_queue = qemu_new_net_queue(qemu_netfilter_pass_to_next, nf);
> if (s->interval) {
> timer_init_us(&s->release_timer, QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL,
