On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> wrote: > On 12/29/2015 10:59 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: >> If there are explicit bug-fixes related to above then my preference >> would be to have them as a separate patchset outside of the performance >> improvements, but then if this isn't feasible then I don't feel that >> this should block getting this patches applied to master. > > Heh. If there are bugs fixed, it's accidental. I was attempting to preserve > behaviour with each patch. I wonder what changed...
Actually I observe a regression in the patch 13/25 (which btw seems not to have make it to the list). A quick attempt to debug it didn't succeed: from a log it looks like the corruption happens after a 'nop' instruction, and setting a breakpoint changes the behavior (optimizer bug?) I'll send you a reproducer off list. -- Regards, Artyom Tarasenko SPARC and PPC PReP under qemu blog: http://tyom.blogspot.com/search/label/qemu
