On 7 January 2016 at 15:55, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 20 December 2015 at 05:43, Peter Crosthwaite
> <crosthwaitepe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> + for (i = 0; i < XLNX_ZYNQMP_NUM_SPIS; i++) {
>> + char bus_name[6];
>> +
>> + object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(&s->spi[i]), true, "realized",
>> &err);
>> +
>> + sysbus_mmio_map(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(&s->spi[i]), 0, spi_addr[i]);
>> + sysbus_connect_irq(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(&s->spi[i]), 0,
>> + gic_spi[spi_intr[i]]);
>> +
>> + /* Alias controller SPI bus to the SoC itself */
>> + snprintf(bus_name, 6, "spi%d", i);
>
> I don't much like these hard coded 6s. This is in init which
> isn't a hot path, so the simplest thing is to use g_strdup_printf()
> and then g_free() it when we're done.
>
> Similarly in patch 6.
>
> Otherwise I like this; I did a quick tweak to my sd card patchset
> to use this approach and it seems to at least compile and do
> the right thing in info qtree (I don't have a xilinx test image
> to do more).
>
> Haven't looked at the detail of how we're doing this in patch 1 yet.
Hi Peter (and/or Alistair) -- do you have time to do a quick respin
of this patchset to use g_strdup_printf() in these cases? It would
be nice to get this series into the tree, because my sd card rework
patchset depends on it...
thanks
-- PMM
