On 8 January 2016 at 14:34, Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk> wrote: > I'm not particularly worried about sun4u for the moment as there are > already other reasons why migration would fail, e.g. no > VMStateDescription for storing PCI interrupt state in the apb host bridge. > > Last time I checked sun4m migration appeared to work under some very > light testing, so as long as this behaviour is preserved then I don't > see a problem.
OK. Does this apply to all 64-bit SPARC CPUs? (There are some things I can simplify in the CPU migration code if we can break 64-bit migration.) thanks -- PMM
