Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> writes:

> On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 10:27:13PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> writes:
>> 
>> > The vast majority of code in virtio-9p.c is actually generic code.
>> > Rename that file to 9p.c and move virtio specific code to
>> > virtio-9p-device.c. Rename virtio-9p.h to 9p.h and split out virtio
>> > specific code to new virtio-9p.h.
>> >
>> > Finally fix up virtio-pci.h header file inclusion.
>> >
>> > Note that V9fsState and V9fsPDU are still tied to virtio at the moment.
>> > They will be handled later.
>> 
>> Can you split this to smaller patches as done for others.
>> 
>
> I'm not sure what you're asking for. IMHO splitting out C and header
> file is better done in one single commit.
>

virtio-9p.h -> 9p.h one patch
virtio_p9_push_and_notify . There is one other instance of that
conversion in the next patch
handle_p9_output movement
V9fsThPool, what is that ?

-aneesh


Reply via email to