On 29 December 2015 at 09:51, Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru> wrote: > There is no reason to limit sigaltstack syscall to just a few > architectures and pretend it is not implemented for others. > > If some architecture is not ready for this, that architecture > should be fixed instead. > > This fixes LP#1516408. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru> > --- > This patch depends on a previous patch I sent, "unicore32: convert > get_sp_from_cpustate from macro to inline", or else unicore32-user > wont build. > --- > linux-user/syscall.c | 6 ------ > 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c > index 6c64ba6..3ceb3e2 100644 > --- a/linux-user/syscall.c > +++ b/linux-user/syscall.c > @@ -8292,14 +8292,8 @@ abi_long do_syscall(void *cpu_env, int num, abi_long > arg1, > break; > } > case TARGET_NR_sigaltstack: > -#if defined(TARGET_I386) || defined(TARGET_ARM) || defined(TARGET_MIPS) || \ > - defined(TARGET_SPARC) || defined(TARGET_PPC) || defined(TARGET_ALPHA) || > \ > - defined(TARGET_M68K) || defined(TARGET_S390X) || defined(TARGET_OPENRISC) > ret = do_sigaltstack(arg1, arg2, get_sp_from_cpustate((CPUArchState > *)cpu_env)); > break; > -#else > - goto unimplemented; > -#endif > > #ifdef CONFIG_SENDFILE > case TARGET_NR_sendfile:
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> thanks -- PMM
